Once a social platform reaches a certain size, it seems the trend is to start using an algorithm to sort the content that users see. Facebook was first and has long been known for its algorithmic News Feed; now Twitter and Instagram are exploring a similar strategy.
The question is: Do algorithmic feeds create a better user experience or do they enable social platforms to better serve advertisers"
When Instagram announced that it would be using an algorithm to order content, the decision was justified in part by the claim that users are missing out on 70 percent of the content they?re subscribed to; an algorithm could potentially show users more of what they follow. This provides a natural boost to advertisers, given how Instagram users engage with brands on the platform.
There?s a lot of debate about algorithms, but the discussion revolves mostly around user experience, and the ability to establish a presence and earn a following on various sites. On Twitter, chronology has been a defining feature, but with the growing interested in curated content, an algorithmic feed may be strictly necessary. Currently Twitter is using a hybrid system, which may be a good way to satisfy the needs and wants of users.
However, the reality of the two-sided social media business model is that brands are also users that want to build a presence and engage with consumers organically. Several years ago when Facebook started its content distribution algorithm, content was pushed to fake users, and organic engagement took a nosedive. If Instagram and Twitter aren?t careful, the algorithmic newsfeeds could backfire.
While most platforms start with a chronological feed, it the shift to algorithms might be born of necessity. Snapchat maintains its chronology and may be the future of social networking, but it doesn?t compete directly with other networks.
Shareablee CEO and founder Tania Yuki told SocialTimes in an email:
There will always be a natural tension between private messagi...